(PC)Hill v. Ehelers et al
| Cymeyon V. Hill and Cymeyon Hill |
| Helers, Avila, Haciendor, Trong, Best, Mova, Pelusro, Rozalai, Loknelle, Brooks, Smith and Ehelers |
| 2:2022cv01468 |
| August 19, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 09/21/2022 RECOMMENDING that the #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be denied and Plaintiff be ordered to pay the $402 filing fee. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Spichka, K.)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Findings and Recommendations served on Cymeyon Hill. (Spichka, K.)
|
|
Filing 9
CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. The new case number is: 2:22-cv-1468-TLN-EFB (PC). (Zignago, K.)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: 9 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Cymeyon V. Hill. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing 8
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing 7
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 9/22/2022. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing 6
CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of California Northern; Case Number 4:22-cv-04315.
|
|
case electronically transmitted to the Eastern District of California. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2022) [Transferred from cand on 8/19/2022.]
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Cymeyon V. Hill. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/18/2022. (amg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) [Transferred from cand on 8/19/2022.]
|
|
Filing 4
Prisoner Statement of Account. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2022) [Transferred from cand on 8/19/2022.]
|
|
Filing 3
Declaration Motion in Support of Claim by Cymeyon V. Hill. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2022) [Transferred from cand on 8/19/2022.]
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Cymeyon V. Hill, CDCR # V53300.The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is directed to submit within 72 hours and in PDF form a certified Prison Trust Account statement for the plaintiff, reflecting the last six months activity, to [email protected]. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2022) [Transferred from cand on 8/19/2022.]
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Avila, Best, Brooks, Haciendor, Loknelle, Mova, Pelusro, Rozalai, Smith, Trong, eHelers. Filed by Cymeyon V. Hill. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2022) [Transferred from cand on 8/19/2022.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
