(HC) James v State of CA Attorney General et al
Petitioner: Ronald Eugene James
Respondent: State of California Attorney General
Case Number: 2:2023cv00037
Filed: January 9, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Allison Claire
Referring Judge: Kimberly J Mueller
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 JUDGMENT dated *3/6/23* ENTERED pursuant to order signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/6/23. (Kastilahn, A)
March 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/6/23 ADOPTING in full and DISMISSING without prejudice Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus. The court DECLINES to issue the certificate of appealability. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
March 6, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Judgment and #5 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations served on Ronald Eugene James. (Kastilahn, A)
January 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Spichka, K.)
January 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/17/2023 ORDERING the Clerk to randomly assign a United States District Judge to this action. IT IS RECOMMENDED that petitioner's #1 application for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed without prejudice, and this court decline to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. 2253. Assigned and referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 21 days. (Yin, K)
January 17, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order, Findings and Recommendations served on Ronald Eugene James. (Yin, K)
January 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 2/13/2023. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Licea Chavez, V)
January 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against State of California Attorney General by Ronald Eugene James.(Licea Chavez, V)
January 10, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Ronald Eugene James. (Licea Chavez, V)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) James v State of CA Attorney General et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ronald Eugene James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of California Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?