(PC) O'Connor v. Romero
| Glenn O'Connor |
| C. Romero |
| 2:2023cv00945 |
| May 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE in regards to IFP fees by Glenn O'Connor (Woodson, A) |
Filing 10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 07/05/2023 GRANTING the #9 Motion for Extension of Time. Motion to Proceed IFP due within 30 days. (Spichka, K.)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Order served on Glenn O'Connor. (Spichka, K.) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for 30 DAY EXTENSION OF TIME to File IFP Documents by Glenn O'Connor. (Woodson, A) |
| Filing 8 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT (SIGNED COPY #1 COMPLAINT) against defendant by Glenn O'Connor.(Lopez, K) Modified on 6/22/2023 (Yin, K). |
|
Filing 7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 06/02/2023 DIRECTING Plaintiff to submit, within 30 days, a Motion to Proceed IFP or the required fees in the amount of $402. (Spichka, K.)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order and IFP Application served on Glenn O'Connor. (Spichka, K.) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Lopez, K) |
| Filing 5 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against C. Romero by Glenn O'Connor. [ #1 Complaint and #4 Signature Page combined pursuant to Chambers Request] (Donati, J) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of SIGNATURE PAGE by Glenn O'Connor re #1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint. (Benson, A.) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 05/24/2023 DIRECTING Plaintiff to re-file a signed complaint within 30 days. (Spichka, K.)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order served on Glenn O'Connor. (Spichka, K.) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *5/22/2023*. Consent or Decline due by 6/26/2023. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Lopez, K) |
| SERVICE BY EMAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Glenn O'Connor. (Lopez, K) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against C. Romero by Glenn O'Connor. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lopez, K) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: (PC) O'Connor v. Romero | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Glenn O'Connor | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: C. Romero | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
