(PS) Visconte v. Garg et al
| Noha Visconte |
| Sunil Garg, IRS, Austin Kenney, Mike Shulman, Bobbie Tillmon, State of California and United States of America |
| 2:2023cv00980 |
| May 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Other Fraud |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS ISSUED as to *IRS, United States of America* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. *Noha Visconte* *1211 Connecticut Avenue, #300* *Washington, DC 20036*. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Sunil Garg, Austin Kenney, Mike Shulman, State of California, Bobbie Tillmon* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. *Noha Visconte* *1211 Connecticut Avenue, #300* *Washington, DC 20036*. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Sunil Garg, IRS, Austin Kenney, Mike Shulman, State of California, Bobbie Tillmon, United States of America by Noha Visconte. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
SERVICE IN PERSON: #2 Summons, #4 Civil New Case Documents for DAD, #3 Summons served on Noha Visconte. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
RECEIPT number 200001108 for $402.00 for Noha Visconte from Jesus Rios Courier LLC. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
