Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Carter v. Department of the Treasury IRS
as 1:2026cv01397
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury IRS
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03604
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Carol McBratnie v. Scott Bessent
as 26-1933
Plaintiff:
CAROL ANN MCBRATNIE
Defendant:
SCOTT BESSENT, Acting Commissioner of the IRS
De Oliveira v. Internal Revenue Service
as 26-2974
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DOMINGUES DE OLIVEIRA, -, MD
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, CARTER TAYLOR, IRS Agent, JOSEPH FUDE, IRS Agent and others
DOBRIN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2026cv00232
Plaintiff:
ADAM MARSHALL DOBRIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BREVARD COUNTY JAIL, BREVARD COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. United States of America et al
as 3:2026cv02797
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamaur Hill
Defendant:
United States of America, Donald Trump, U.S. Congress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. IRS Dept, The et al
as 3:2026cv04859
Plaintiff:
Mr. Marshall Leon Watkins
Defendant:
IRS Dept, The and Mr. S.C. McHenry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Kaplan v. Bessent, et al.
as 26-6730
Plaintiff:
CHARLES KAPLAN
Defendant:
SCOTT BESSENT, IRS Commissioner, CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Mr. LAROCHELLE, Director, Return Integrity Verification Ops. and others
DeWayne v. Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2026cv04812
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and IRS
Plaintiff:
Bishop Ruben DeWayne
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
GT Glass and Windows LLC
as 3:2026cv11647
Petitioner:
GT Glass and Windows LLC
Defendant:
United States, Commissioner IRS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
