(PC) Rice v. Gonzales et al
| Nicholas Rice |
| Nicholas Gonzales, Robert Marquez, Daniella Roman, Amaini Varela, Thomas, M. Martinez, Tocong, Guerra, Crlara and Ja Michael |
| 2:2023cv01421 |
| July 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Allison Claire |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:23-cv-1421-AC) to Fresno (1:23-cv-1094-BAM) signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/20/2023. (Huang, H)
|
| INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER to Fresno Division. New Case Number 1:23-cv-1094-BAM. Old Case Number 2:23-cv-1421-AC. CASE CLOSED. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 8/21/2023. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Clemente Licea, O) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Nicholas Rice. (Clemente Licea, O) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Nicholas Rice. (Clemente Licea, O) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Crlara, Nicholas Gonzales, Guerra, Robert Marquez, M. Martinez, Ja Michael, Daniella Roman, Thomas, Tocong, Amaini Varela by Nicholas Rice.(Clemente Licea, O) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
