(PS) Rigor v. Santa Clara County et al
| Soraya Maria Rigor |
| Santa Clara County, Fernandez Libby, The Sacramento LGBT Community Center, Attorney General and Solicitor General |
| 2:2023cv01679 |
| August 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Daniel J Calabretta |
| Allison Claire |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 08/16/23 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP and RECOMMENDING that all claims against all defendants should be dismissed with prejudice. Referred to Judge Daniel J. Calabretta. Objections due within 21 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Licea Chavez, V)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Findings and Recommendations served on Soraya Rigor. (Licea Chavez, V)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Soraya Rigor. (Licea Chavez, V)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Attorney General, Fernandez Libby, Santa Clara County, Solicitor General, The Sacramento LGBT Community Center by Soraya Rigor. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Opening Brief)(Licea Chavez, V)
|
|
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Licea Chavez, V)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
