Cases 1 - 10 of 557
Scarlett v. County of Santa Clara, et al.
as 24-7570
Defendant:
SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, a department of the County of Santa Clara, MOLLY O'NEAL, JEFFREY FRANCIS ROSEN and others
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY THEODORE SCARLETT
Sternberg v. Warneck, et al.
as 24-7206
Defendant:
CITY OF SAN JOSE, MAGDALENA LAW GROUP, JEFF DRAHER and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. STERNBERG
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv08527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Floyd v. Santa Clara Department of Correction, et al.
as 24-6866
Defendant:
CHARLES STOKES, III #11240, Deputy ISAIAH CAMPOS, #11214, Deputy JESUS PATINO, #11308 and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DEVIN FLOYD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv07842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nejad v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-6707
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AT&T INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SHAHROKH SAADAT NEJAD, AKA, Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad; AKA, Shahrokh Saadat Nejad; AKA, Shahrokh S. Nejad; AKA, Shahrokh Saadat; AKA, Shahrokh Nejad
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv07397
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv07319
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hazari v. Santa Clara County Superior Court, et al.
as 24-6312
Defendant:
PETER KIRWAN, D. D. HUGHMANICK, CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT and others
Plaintiff:
CYRUS HAZARI
de Tagle v. Santa Clara County
as 5:2024cv07175
Defendant:
Santa Clara County
Plaintiff:
Orlando Sanchez de Tagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
