Nejad v. United States of America, et al.
SHAHROKH SAADAT NEJAD, AKA, Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad; AKA, Shahrokh Saadat Nejad; AKA, Shahrokh S. Nejad; AKA, Shahrokh Saadat; AKA, Shahrokh Nejad |
CALIFORNIA SUPERIOR COURT, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AT&T INC., UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JORDAN Z. MARKS, JUAN CISNEROS, AMBER PALOMA NORIEGA DEL CID, MICHAEL RODDY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, MICHAEL WHITTINGTON, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, GERARD BIRKHAUSER, MICHAEL MERCADO, WALMART INC., AHMAD SAADAT NEJAD, WAYNE LEROY TEETER, T-MOBILE US, INC., COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CLARA COUNTY OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, MAUREEN F. HALLAHAN, GLENN GOSSETT, BEST BUY CO., INC., CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF SAN JOSE, CITY OF PALO ALTO, CITY OF SARATOGA, SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT, SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, DOES, 1 through 50,000, CITY OF CUPERTINO and CITY OF SANTA CLARA |
24-6707 |
November 4, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 REFERRAL NOTICE. This matter is referred to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3); see also Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002) (revocation of forma pauperis status is appropriate where district court finds the appeal to be frivolous). If the district court elects to revoke in forma pauperis status, the district court is requested to notify this court and the parties of such determination within 21 days of the date of this referral. If the district court does not revoke in forma pauperis status, such status will continue automatically for this appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). This referral shall not affect the briefing schedule previously established by this court. [Entered: 11/05/2024 01:01 PM] |
Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 12/18/2024. For appeal no. 24-6707, 3:24-cv-01519-BAS-KSC. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/04/2024 01:49 PM] |
Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:24-cv-01519-BAS-KSC has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-6707 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/04/2024 01:47 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.