(HC) Johnson v. Brewer
Petitioner: Darrell Johnson
Respondent: D. Brewer
Case Number: 2:2023cv01934
Filed: September 8, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K Delaney
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #1 Petition served on US Attorney's Office pursuant to #6 Order Directing Respondent to File a Response to the Petition. (Spichka, K.)
October 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/17/2023. Consent or Decline due by 11/20/2023. (Spichka, K.)
October 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/17/2023 GRANTING #5 Motion to Proceed IFP and DIRECTING RESPONDENT to File a Response to Petition within 30 days from the date of this order. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the United States Attorney. (Spichka, K.) Modified on 10/18/2023 (Huang, H).
October 17, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order Directing Respondent to File a Response to the Petition served on Darrell Johnson. (Spichka, K.)
October 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Darrell Johnson. (Lopez, K)
September 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/27/2023 ORDERING petitioner to submit, within 30 days, a request to proceed ifp or the $5.00 filing fee. The Clerk shall send petitioner an ifp form. (Yin, K)
September 27, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order and ifp form served on Darrell Johnson. (Yin, K)
September 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Nair, C)
September 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 10/16/2023. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Murphy, J)
September 13, 2023 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Darrell Johnson. (Murphy, J)
September 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 2241 PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against D. Brewer by Darrell Johnson.(Murphy, J)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (HC) Johnson v. Brewer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Darrell Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: D. Brewer
Represented By: Bureau of Prisons Regional Counsel
Represented By: US Attorney's Office- 2241 Unit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?