Scheafer v. Target Corp.
Byron Scheafer |
Target Corporation |
2:2024cv00651 |
February 29, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Deborah Barnes |
Daniel J Calabretta |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Byron Scheafer. (Telfer, Jill) |
Filing 11 AMENDED CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Clemente Licea, O) |
Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Daniel J. Calabretta and Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. The new case number is: 2:24-cv-00651 DJC DB. (Clemente Licea, O) |
Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Clark, Michelle) |
Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Telfer, Jill) |
Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Clark, Michelle) |
Filing 6 [DISREGARD- COUNSEL TO REFILE] CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Clark, Michelle) Modified on 3/21/2024 (Licea Chavez, V). |
Filing 5 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Target Corporation. Attorney Clark, Michelle Ann added.(Clark, Michelle) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: All Defendants on 03/01/2024. (Telfer, Jill) Modified on 3/6/2024 (Lopez, K). |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Licea Chavez, V) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Target Corporation* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Jill P. Telfer* *Law Office of Jill P. Telfer* *980 9th Street* *Ste 2550*. (Licea Chavez, V) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Byron Scheafer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Telfer, Jill) |
RECEIPT number ACAEDC-11373934 for $405.00 from Jill P.Telfer. (Licea Chavez, V) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Scheafer v. Target Corp. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Byron Scheafer | |
Represented By: | Jill P. Telfer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Target Corporation | |
Represented By: | Michelle Ann Clark |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.