Moussavi Nik v. Garland et al
| Seyed Saeid Moussavi Nik |
| Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Emilia Bardini and Christopher Wray |
| 2:2024cv00726 |
| March 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Allison Claire |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added Attorney Elliot C. Wong, GOVT for Emilia Bardini, Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Christopher Wray. (Wong, Elliot) Modified on 4/4/2024 (Kastilahn, A). |
| Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference SET for 7/11/2024 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Emilia Bardini, Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Christopher Wray* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Mohhamad Ali Parvand* *459 West Broadway, Ste Unit 7* *Glendale, CA 91204*. (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Seyed Saeid Moussavi Nik(Parvand, Mohhamad) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Seyed Saeid Moussavi Nik. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11388563) (Parvand, Mohhamad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
