(PC) Sapp v. McCarn et al
| Juan Sapp |
| McCarn, Rogers and J. Crowley |
| 2:2026cv01706 |
| May 4, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sean C Riordan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Juan Sapp. (Deputy Clerk AKP) |
Filing 4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sean C. Riordan on 05/20/2026 DIRECTING Plaintiff to submit a Motion for Proceed IFP or the required fees in the amount of $405 within 30 days. (Deputy Clerk KS)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order and IFP Application served on Juan Sapp. (Deputy Clerk KS) |
| Filing 3 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Deputy Clerk LMS) |
| Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED. Consent or Decline due by 6/8/2026. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 Litigant Letter) (Deputy Clerk JAW) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Juan Sapp. (Deputy Clerk JAW) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Juan Sapp. (Deputy Clerk JAW) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
