Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Rogers v. Arch Insurance Company
as 3:2026cv01383
Plaintiff:
Tyler G. Rogers
Defendant:
Arch Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Baker v. Gaines et al
as 4:2026cv00674
Plaintiff:
Daniel Baker
Defendant:
Gaines and Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, II v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2026cv00494
Plaintiff:
Roger Van Jones, II
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Taylor v. United States of America et al
as 5:2026ct03197
Plaintiff:
Daniel Taylor
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden FCI - II Butner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rogers et al v. Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2026cv00544
Plaintiff:
Doris Rogers and Gregory Rogers
Defendant:
Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Ross v. Cooley et al
as 5:2026cv00465
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hubert Ross
Defendant:
Leslie Cooley and Roger E. Chip Hawley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harper v. Horn et al
as 3:2026cv00326
Plaintiff:
Tevin Lamar Harper
Defendant:
C/O Horn, C/O Ochea, Sheriff Spangler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
OZIMEK v. YOUNG
as 4:2026cv00323
Plaintiff:
Taylor Ozimek
Defendant:
ROGER A YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
