Cases 1 - 10 of 427
Rowbotham v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00151
Petitioner:
Roger D Rowbotham
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Truitt v. Mcdougle et al
as 5:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Jessie F Truitt, III
Defendant:
Mike Mcdougle, Susanne Campbell, FNU Madden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yukich et al v. Attorney General of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Philip Yukich, III and Janel Renee Stewart
Defendant:
Attorney General of Oklahoma, Kenny Rogers and Robert Fagnant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jolliff v. Rogers County Sheriff's Department, The et al
as 4:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kathy Jolliff
Defendant:
Rogers County Sheriff's Department, The, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kolosha v. Rogers
as 5:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
Vitaly Kolosha
Respondent:
David Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Bain v. GOE et al
as 5:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Keith Elliott Bain
Defendant:
GOE/ LRCF, Warden Cole, John Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morgan v. Biden et al
as 5:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan
Respondent:
Joe Biden, United States, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Morgan v. Biden
as 5:2023cv01097
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan
Respondent:
Joe Biden and David Rogers
Bowens v. Rogers County Sheriffs Office
as 5:2023cv01054
Plaintiff:
Don Bowens
Defendant:
Rogers County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
