Thompson v. Harris et al
Michael Thompson |
Kim Santsche, Becky Alsup and Ronald J. Harris |
1:2012cv06529 |
December 26, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Eureka Office |
Humboldt |
Nandor J. Vadas |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 66 ORDER by Judge Nandor J. Vadas denying 59 Motion for Sanctions (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2014) |
Filing 58 JUDGMENT For Defendants, ***Civil Case Terminated.. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 5/5/2014. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2014) |
Filing 57 ORDER by Judge Nandor J. Vadas denying 49 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting 53 Motion to Dismiss (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2014) |
Filing 48 ORDER Discharging Order to Show Cause, Staying Ruling and Setting Further Schedule. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor Vadas on 2/24/2014. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2014) |
Filing 43 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re dismissal. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 2/18/2014 10:00 AM. Pretrial conference and trial vacated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor Vadas on 1/17/2014. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2014) |
Filing 22 ORDER re Request to Excuse Defendants from personally appearing at settlement conference 21 Letter filed by Becky Alsup, Ronald J. Harris, Kim Santsche. Signed Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 11/19/2013. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2013) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.