Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Erskine, et al.
as 26-4007
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
ROSS GREGORY ERSKINE, LFS FUNDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a private Wyoming Limited Partnership, STEPHEN MICHAEL THOMPSON and others
Thompson v. United States of America
as 0:2026cv02861
Plaintiff:
Michael Thompson, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Thompson v. Fairway Independent Mortgage Corp.
as 3:2026cv12307
Plaintiff:
Michael Thompson
Defendant:
Fairway Independent Mortgage Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Terwilliger v. Fitzpatrick et al
as 3:2026cv00339
Plaintiff:
Daniel Terwilliger
Defendant:
Jonathan Fitzpatrick, Michael F. Diamond, Michael Beland and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Carlos Deromano v. Alabama State Bar, et al
as 26-11375
Plaintiff:
CARLOS DEROMANO
Defendant:
ALABAMA STATE BAR, DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY BIRMINGHAM AND CLERKS, MICHAEL THOMPSON and others
Lee v. Fitzpatrick et al
as 3:2026cv00302
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee
Defendant:
Jonathan Fitzpatrick, Daniel Rivera, Neal Aronson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Morrison et al v. IHRONE Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv11030
Plaintiff:
Matthew Morrison, Ahmed Almarsoumi, Scott Benson and others
Defendant:
IHRONE Inc., LGC Global, Inc. and LGC Global Energy FM, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Hammond et al v. Thompson, M.D. et al
as 1:2026cv00926
Plaintiff:
Kelly Render Hammond
Defendant:
Michael Thompson, M.D., Khiyah Burton, R.N., Tarita Williams, R.N. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
