Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Porter et al v. MA, State of et al
as 1:2026cv00961
Defendant:
Carol Stone, David Stone, Renee Roy and others
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Porter, New Englander First Trust, Mallard Home Realty Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thompson v. Crown Cell, Inc.
as 8:2026cv04252
Plaintiff:
Michael Thompson Individually, and as Assignee of United Expert Holdings, LLC d/b/a Round Table Group and Round Table Group
Defendant:
Crown Cell, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Thompson v. Unknown
as 2:2026cv01051
Petitioner:
Joseph Michael Thompson
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
THOMPSON v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 1:2026cv01996
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL THOMPSON
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carlos Deromano v. QTC Medical Services Inc., et al
as 26-13329
Plaintiff:
CARLOS DEROMANO
Defendant:
QTC MEDICAL SERVICES INC., LAXMI CHALLA, LAUREN POPE and others
v. Thompson et al
as 1:2026cv25712
Defendant:
Michael Thompson and Crown Cell, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Thompson v. Crown Cell, Inc.
as 1:2026cv25724
Defendant:
Crown Cell, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Thompson Individually, and as Assignee of United Expert Holdings, LLC d/b/a Round Table Group and Round Table Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Boyle et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 1:2026cv01065
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Boyle, Andrew Fotos, Patricia Fotos and others
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Thompson v. Brandon, et al.
as 26-5356
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL THOMPSON
Defendant:
SCOTT BRANDON, DUBLIN POLICE SERVICES and ALAMEDA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
