Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Thompson Construction Co., LLC et al v. Flagstar Bank
as 4:2024cv11149
Plaintiff:
Thompson Construction Co., LLC, Thompson Properties, LLC and Michael Thompson
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Thompson et al v. Thornton et al
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Michael Thompson, Thompson Properties, LLC, United Builders, LLC and others
Defendant:
Rose Thornton, Michelle Signor, Nicholas Thornton and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Fraud & Related Activity in Connection with Computers
Thompson Properties, LLC et al v. Farmers State Bank
as 1:2023cv00624
Plaintiff:
Thompson Properties, LLC, South Willowbrook Associates, LLC, Gulf Shores, LLC and others
Defendant:
Farmers State Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Thompson, Sr. v. Stockwell et al
as 2:2018cv12392
Defendant:
Kenneth Dombrow, Dan Boone, Lisa Lauzon and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Thompson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Gresham #272603 et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2016cv01402
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham #272603, Charles Johnson, Dabon Reed #801306 and others
Defendant:
Willie Smith and Additional Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson #176309 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv01066
Plaintiff:
Michael Thompson #176309
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Daniel H. Heyns, John Prelesnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv13931
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Thompson #229033 v. Lafler
as 1:2010cv00132
Petitioner:
Michael Thompson #229033
Respondent:
Blaine Lafler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Lafler CASE TRANSFERRED
as 2:2010cv10465
Petitioner:
Michael Thompson
Respondent:
Blaine Lafler
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
