McDaniel v. The United States of America et al
| McDaniel and Tanya Grace McDaniel |
| The United States of America, University of Davis, Ca., Avid Reader Book Store, Adele Young, Ellyn Bell, Stacey Bell, Peter Matthews, Colin Winnette, Bill Pieper, Pence Gallery, Janet Napolitano and The City of Davis, Ca. |
| 1:2016cv00414 |
| January 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Eureka Office |
| Yolo |
| Nandor J Vadas |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CLERK'S Letter Spreading Mandate to Counsel (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2016) |
Filing 12
ORDER of USCA as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Tanya Grace McDaniel "Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to pay the docketing/filing fees in this case. This order served on the district court shall constitute the mandate of this court." (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2016) Modified on 8/26/2016 (msr, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER of USCA as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Tanya Grace McDaniel "Appellants motions to proceed in forma pauperis are denied because we find that the appeal is frivolous." (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2016)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER of USCA as to #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Tanya Grace McDaniel "Within 21 days from the date of this order, appellant shall: (1) file a motion with this court to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) pay $505 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal and provide proof of payment to this court; or (3) otherwise show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute." (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2016)
|
| Filing 9 USCA Case Number 16-15541 USCA 9th Circuit for #7 Notice of Appeal filed by Tanya Grace McDaniel. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2016) |
| Filing 8 Mailed request for payment of docket fee to appellant (cc to USCA) (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2016) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Tanya Grace McDaniel. Appeal of Judgment #6 , Order Dismissing Case, Terminate Motions #5 (Appeal fee FEE NOT PAID.) (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2016) |
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 3/4/2016. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2016) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE; #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as Moot. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 3/4/2016. (njvlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2016)
|
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Tanya Grace McDaniel.. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2016) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 4/19/2016. Case Management Conference set for 4/26/2016 02:00 PM in Eureka. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order For Judge Vadas, #2 Standing Order For All Judges)(msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2016) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Tanya Grace McDaniel. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2016) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filed byTanya Grace McDaniel. by 2/8/2016. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-H, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2016) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
