Doe v. Astrue
Plaintiff: John Doe
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 3:2009cv00980
Filed: March 2, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Marilyn H. Patel
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 206 ORDER re 205 Proposed Order filed by Michael J. Astrue. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/2/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2012)
March 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 201 ORDER Re 193 Joint Statement Re Plaintiffs' Summary Judgment Motions. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/1/2012. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2012)
February 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 185 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Denying 109 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2012)
February 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 179 ORDER Re Hearing on February 3, 2012. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/1/2012. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2012)
August 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 157 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Denying 143 Defendant's Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2011)
August 16, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 156 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting 126 Defendant's Motion to Stay. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2011)
February 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 44 STIPULATION AND ORDER: Status Conference set for 3/15/2010 02:00 PM in Courtroom 15, 18th Floor, San Francisco; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 2/18/2010. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2010)
August 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel: Defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED with respect to plaintiff's Rehabilitation Act claim and is GRANTED with respect to plaintiff's Due Process claim. Should plaintiff choose to do so, he must file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2009)
June 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting defendant's request for leave to file motion to dismiss prior to initial case management conference; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 6/10/2009. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2009)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Doe v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Doe
Represented By: Thuy-Nhien Thi Vuong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?