Williams v. Horel et al
Michael Paul Williams |
Robert A. Horel, M. A. Cook, Dayton N. Conover, Fred Stoner, R. Orr, J. Williams, R. Pimentel and N. Grannis |
3:2009cv05314 |
November 9, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Del Norte |
Maxine M. Chesney |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 STIPULATION AND ORDER of DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 12/8/11. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2011) |
Filing 44 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 28, 2011. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2011) |
Filing 39 ORDER re 38 Order Setting Settlement Conference. Order granting request for CDCR representative to attend settlement conference by telephone. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2011) |
Filing 24 ORDER DENYING AS MOOT 8 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SERVE DEFENDANTS; GRANTING 21 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE DEFENDANTS' DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS; DENYING 21 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING PRISON OFFICIALS TO PHOTOCOPY LEGAL DOCUMENTS IN EXCESS OF 50 PAGES. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 30, 2010. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2010) |
Filing 14 ORDER GRANTING 12 DEFENDANTS' FIRST REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 11, 2010. (mmcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2010) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.