United States Of America et al v. Rayl
| United States Of America and Jon Sustarich |
| Karen Rayl |
| 3:2010cv05426 |
| December 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| James Larson |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7609 IRS: Petition to Quash IRS Summons |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONERS' APPLICATION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CONTEMPT; DIRECTING RESPONDENT TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SHE SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT; SETTING JULY 8, 2011 HEARING; DIRECTIONS TO PETITIONERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 27, 2011. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2011)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONERS TO SERVE PETITION; SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND SCHEDULING APRIL 1, 2011 HEARING ON PETITION TO ENFORCE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS. No later than January 28, 2011, petitioners shall serve the petition and a copy of this order on respondent, and, no later than February 4, 2011, shall file proof of said service. No later than March 4, 2011, respondent shall file any response to the petition. No later than March 18, 2011, petitioners shall file any reply. The Court will conduct a hearing on the petition on April 1, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. The Case Management Conference scheduled for March 11, 2011 is vacated. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 16, 2010. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2010)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
