United States Of America v. 1937 Packard Super 8, Vin 1063203 et al
| United States Of America |
| Approximately $1,211,69612 from Wells Fargo Account Ending in 7465, 1949 Lincoln, Vin 9EH56861, 1959 Lincoln, Vin H9YC420934, 1966 AMC, Vin A6BA75Q102707, 1937 Packard Super 8, Vin 1063203, VP Bugatti, Serial Number 57477, 1962 Mercedes, 220SE Cabriolet, Vin 11102310030407 and Approximately $5,504,017.57 from Charles Schwab Account Ending in 4213 |
| 3:2011cv05603 |
| November 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Other |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 841 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
JUDGMENT in favor of plaintiff and against defendants. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 3/29/2012. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2012)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO REMOVE MOTION FROM CALENDAR [re 21 Brief, filed by United States Of America]. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 3/16/2012. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2012)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO REMOVE CMC re 15 MOTION for Entry of Default (REQUEST TO THE CLERK FROM PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO ENTER A DEFAULT AND REQUEST TO TAKE FEBRUARY 23, 2012 CMC OFF CALENDAR) filed by United States Of America. Signed by Judge Alsup on February 22, 2012. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
