Boysen v. Walgreen Co.
Plaintiff: Randy Boysen
Defendant: Walgreen Co.
Case Number: 3:2011cv06262
Filed: December 13, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Susan Illston
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 45 JUDGMENT (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 8/16/2012)
August 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER: The date by which Plaintiff must file any amended complaint in this action, from the current date of August 2, 2012 (per Docket No. 41), until August 16, 2012., Motions terminated: 42 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 41 Order on Motion to Dismiss to Continue Deadline for any Amended Complaint until August 16, 2012, filed by Randy Boysen.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 8/6/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2012)
July 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT WALGREEN CO.'S MOTION TO DISMISS 14 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 7/19/2012)
May 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER continuing 6/22/12 case management conference. The initial Case Management Conference is now set for 7/20/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 5/22/12., Motions terminated: 23 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 13 Clerks Notice TO MODIFY DATE OF INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Randy Boysen. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2012) Modified on 5/22/2012 (tfS, COURT STAFF).
May 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed on 5/18/12 by Judge Illston STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 14 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs Oppositions to the Motions, currently due on May 21 (14 days after service and filing per Local Rule 7-3), shall be due on June 4, 2012.Defe ndants Replies in Support of the Motions, currently dueMay 28 (7 days after the Oppositions are filed and served), shall be due on June 18, 2012.The currently noticed hearing date on both Motions, of June 15, 2012, shall be extended to July 20, 2012, 18 MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending MDL Consideration TO MODIFY HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING DEADLINES filed by Randy Boysen., Motions terminated: 22 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 14 MOTION to Dismiss , 18 MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending MDL Consideration TO MODIFY HEARING DATE AND BRIEFING DEADLINES filed by Randy Boysen. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2012)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boysen v. Walgreen Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randy Boysen
Represented By: J. Kirk Boyd
Represented By: Robert Ahdoot
Represented By: Theodore Walter Maya
Represented By: Michael Francis Ram
Represented By: Tina Wolfson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walgreen Co.
Represented By: James M. Schurz
Represented By: Renee Devon Wasserman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?