Simmons v. Belmont Police Department et al
| Rob Joseph Simmons |
| Parsons, Jim Fox, Belmont Police Department and San Mateo Police |
| 5:2012cv01716 |
| April 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| San Mateo |
| Edward J. Davila |
| PSLC HHL |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Within twenty-eight (28) days of the date this order is filed, Plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint using the court's form complaint. the amended complaint must inclund the caption and civil cas e number used in this order and the words "SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT" on the first page and write in the case number for this actions, Case No. C 12-01716 EJD (PR). Plaintiff must answer all the questions on the form in order for the action to proceed. Failure to respond in accordance with this order by filing an amended complaint will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff. the Clerk shall include two copies of the court's complaint with a copy of this order to plaintiff.. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/7/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Form Habeas Complaint)(ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
