Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Parsons v. United States of America
as 1:2026cv00118
Plaintiff:
James D. Parsons
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Johnson v. DOC
as 26-2555
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JOHNSON
Defendant:
CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, In it's official capacity, ANGEL QUIROS, In their individual and official capacities, WILLIAM MULLIGAN, In their individual and official capacities and others
Ransburg v. Jackson Mac Haik Ford, Ltd et al
as 3:2026cv00743
Plaintiff:
James R. Ransburg
Defendant:
Jackson Mac Haik Ford, Ltd and Cecilia Parsons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Croskey #396034 v. Parsons et al
as 1:2026cv02549
Plaintiff:
David L. Croskey #396034
Defendant:
Unknown Parsons and Unknown Brooke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Del Parson Studio, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2026cv11003
Plaintiff:
Del Parson Studio,Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Henry v. Russell et al
as 3:2026cv01180
Plaintiff:
Cecil Henry
Defendant:
Russell, Parsons, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. ASHER et al
as 1:2026cv01877
Plaintiff:
JERRITT JOHNSON
Defendant:
JERRY ASHER, MATTHEW DECKARD, JESSICA KNAPP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Russell et al
as 3:2026cv01166
Plaintiff:
Cecil Henry
Defendant:
Prosecutor Russell, Sheriff Parsons, Sheriff Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shallon Hawkins v. State of Mo. Governor's Office, et al
as 26-2781
Plaintiff:
Shallon Hawkins
Defendant:
State of Missouri Governor's Office, Erick Greiten or Mike Parson, State of Missouri Department of Corrections, Anne L. Precythe, Deputy Director to the Department of Corrections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
