Cases 1 - 10 of 100
PARSON v. CAMPBELL'S SNACKS
as 1:2026cv01432
Plaintiff:
JOHN PARSON
Defendant:
CAMPBELL'S SNACKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Solee v. Parsons Corporation et al
as 1:2026cv01902
Plaintiff:
Christopher Solee
Defendant:
Parsons Corporation, The Board of Directors of Parsons Corporation, The Parsons Policy and Advisory Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Pool v. STATE OF TEXAS et al
as 6:2026cv00433
Petitioner:
Mark Jerome Pool
Respondent:
STATE OF TEXAS, Brazos County Texas and Jarvis Parsons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez v. Ridges Community Association, et al.
as 26-4035
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LOPEZ
Defendant:
RIDGES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, MONTE MILLER, BARBARA VENEZIA and others
PARSON v. GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS et al
as 3:2026cv00025
Plaintiff:
DESIREE M. PARSON
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS and Commissioner of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Parsons v. Sniper Elite Services, LLC
as 2:2026cv02106
Plaintiff:
Garrett Parsons
Defendant:
Sniper Elite Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
PARSONS v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2026cv04218
Plaintiff:
JAMES PARSONS
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
