Mendez et al v. Becher et al
| Carlos Mendez |
| Teresa Becher, Montour and JW Anderson |
| 3:2012cv04170 |
| August 8, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Contra Costa |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER granting 75 Stipulation of Dismissal. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/20/2014. (All hearings and deadlines are VACATED.)(jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2014)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER RESETTING HEARING DATE ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW. The hearing date on plaintiff's counsel's motion to withdraw is reset to Wednesday May 21, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/14/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2014)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER RE HEARING ON 64 MOTION TO WITHDRAW. Mr. Mendez shall appear in person at the hearing set for Wednesday May 28, 2014 at 2:00 p.m. Plaintiff's counsel shall serve this Order on Mr. Mendez and advise Mr. Mendez of the need to appear at the May 28, 2014 hearing. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 04/24/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2014)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Hon. William H. Orrick granting 55 Motion for Summary Judgment. Summary judgment is GRANTED to defendant Anderson on all claims asserted against him. Partial summary judgment is also GRANTED to defendant Montour on the federal and state false arrest claims. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2014)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER: The parties should advise the court by 2:00 p.m. if they are going to ask the district court to vacate the settlement conference and must file their request with the district court simultaneously. See ECF Nos. 48, 49. The undersigned wil l not vacate a settlement conference referred by the district court but will consider a brief continuance to accommodate the schedules of counsel and the clients. Absent a further order of the court, Defendant's settlement conference statement is due by 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, January 15, 2014 at 10:00 a.m., must respond to Plaintiff's demand, and may be emailed to the court's orders box at lbpo@cand.uscourts.gov. The court denies the motions to excuse the personal appearance of the parties for the reasons stated in the telephonic settlement conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 1/14/2014. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2014)
|
|
Filing
40
CIVIL PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/05/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2013)
|
|
Filing
38
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 34 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 09/12/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2013)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER RE: ATTENDANCE AT ENE. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/11/2013. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2013)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting 18 Defendant Chief Becher's Motion to Dismiss. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2013)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting in Part and Denying in Part 5 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2012)
|
|
Filing
9
STANDING ORDER. Signed by Judge EDWARD M. CHEN on 9/21/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2012)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Edward M. Chen. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 9/18/12. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2012)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
