Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Kelly v. First NBC Bank
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Russell Kelly
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Company as Receiver for First NBC Bank, Jose Carlos Mendez, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Incorrectly Filed
as 1:2023cv00134
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Mendez
Defendant:
Antony J Blinken
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00305
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mendez et al v. National Specialty Insurance Company
as 0:2023cv61440
Plaintiff:
Carlos Mendez and Keila Tavarez
Defendant:
National Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
MENDEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv20329
Plaintiff:
CARLOS MENDEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mendez v. Garland
as 23-1308
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS MENDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
MENDEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12319
Plaintiff:
JUAN CARLOS MENDEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MEDINA et al v. ONE STOP CENTER, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01031
Plaintiff:
CARLOS MENDEZ MEDINA, JR. and YOSMAN MEDINA CASTRO
Defendant:
ONE STOP CENTER, INC. and MASUD A. OMAR
3Rd Party Defendant:
GTS TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION and KIRBY L GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
