Riccardi v. Lynch et al
| Philip Riccardi |
| Michael R Lynch, Leo Apotheker, Margaret C. Whitman, Catherine A. Lesjak, G. Kennedy Thompson, Shumeet Banerji, Gary M Reiner, John H. Hammergren, Marc L Andreessen, Raymond J. Lane, Patricia F Russo, Ann M Livermore, Ralph V Whitworth, Shane V. Robison, Lawrence T. Babbio, Jr., Sari M. Baldauf, Dominique Senequier, Deloitte LLP, KPMG LLP, Perella Weinberg Partners UK LLP, Barclays Capital and Hewlett-Packard Company |
| 5:2012cv06003 |
| November 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Charles R. Breyer |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Stockholders Suits |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
450
Order Adopting Special Master's Report and Recommendation by Judge Charles R. Breyer. (crblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2015)
|
|
Filing
437
ORDER granting user PACER exemption. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 9/3/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2015)
|
|
Filing
428
ORDER APPOINTING SPECIAL MASTER FOR REVIEW OF SEALING REQUESTS. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 08/17/2015. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2015)
|
|
Filing
424
ORDER RE APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL MASTER FOR REVIEW OF SEALING REQUESTS. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 08/10/215. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2015)
|
|
Filing
417
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 365 Motion for Settlement (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2015)
|
|
Filing
411
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 337 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 367 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 378 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 380 Administrative Motion to Fi le Under Seal; denying 390 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 398 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 401 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 404 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2015)
|
|
Filing
335
ORDER as modified 334 STIPULATION re 333 MOTION to Intervene [NOTICE OF RENEWED MOTION AND RENEWED MOTION TO INTERVENE Stipulation to file response brief on May 6, 2015 filed by Hewlett-Packard Company, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 333 MOTION to Intervene [NOTICE OF RENEWED MOTION AND RENEWED MOTION TO INTERVENE. Responses due by 4/29/2015. Replies due by 5/6/2015. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/27/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2015)
|
|
Filing
332
ORDER Re Pending Motions by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. The Demand Refused Plaintiffs' motion 271 need not be resolved prior to the final approval hearing. Shareholder Copeland's motion 307 is moot. This Court recommends that Sushovan Hussain's motion 308 be resolved prior to the final approval hearing.(shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2015)
|
|
Filing
331
STIPULATION AND ORDER Regarding Discovery in Connection with the Third Amended and Restated Stipulation of Settlement signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte: granting as modified 330 Stipulation. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2015)
|
|
Filing
328
ORDER On Shareholder Copeland's Motion to Shorten Time by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte: denying 321 Motion. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2015)
|
|
Filing
322
ORDER Re Discovery Procedures by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2015)
|
|
Filing
319
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 277 Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement; finding as moot 286 Ex Parte Application; finding as moot 309 Motion to Shorten Time; granting 150 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 269 Motion to Intervene; denying 276 Motion for Preliminary Injunction (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2015)
|
|
Filing
299
ORDER denying 267 Motion to Vacate (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2015)
|
|
Filing
266
ORDER re withdrawal of motions to seal. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/19/2014. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2014)
|
|
Filing
156
ORDER granting 155 STIPULATION re: Hearing Date on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Approval of Derivative Settlement filed by Stanley Morrical. Reset Hearing as to 149 MOTION for Settlement (Preliminary Approval of D erivative Settlement). Motion for Preliminary Approval Hearing reset for 8/25/2014 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 7/16/2014. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2014)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER re 97 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by Hewlett-Packard Company. Attorney Darryl Paul Rains; Mark R.S. Foster and Judson Earle Lobdell terminated. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/1/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2013)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER re 92 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by Hewlett-Packard Company, Attorney Darryl Paul Rains,Judson Earle Lobdell for Hewlett-Packard Company added. Attorney Robert E. Gooding, Jr; Kimberly Alexander Kane; Karen A. Pieslak Pohlmann; Marc J. Sonnenfeld; Matthew S. Weiler; Jennifer Renee Bagosy and Joseph Edward Floren terminated.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/19/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2013)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER UNSEALING COMPLAINT IN PART AND REQUIRING FURTHER BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 05/20/2013. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
