Lopez v. City and County of San Francisco et al
| Ricardo Lopez |
| York Kwan, City and County of San Francisco, Mike Helms and San Francisco Municipal Transit Agency |
| 3:2012cv06523 |
| December 26, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Maria-Elena James |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James granting 20 Motion for Summary Judgment (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2014)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 5/1/2014 10:00 AM. Show Cause Response due by 4/21/2014. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 4/14/2014. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2014)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER RE: JOINT STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 3/20/2014. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2014)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER RE: ATTENDANCE AT MEDIATION. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 10/11/13. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2013)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 13 Stipulation To Continue Mediation. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2013)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER GRANTING re 8 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Ricardo Lopez. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 1/7/2013. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
