Cases 1 - 9 of 9
San Francisco Taxi Coalition, et al v. City & County of San Francisco, et al
as 19-16439
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, EDWARD D. REISKIN, Director of Transportation and SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSIT AGENCY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAN FRANCISCO TAXI COALITION, GEORGE HORBAL, S.F. TOWN TAXI INC. and others
San Francisco Taxi Coalition et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2019cv01972
Defendant:
Edward D Reiskin, San Francisco Municipal Transit Agency and City and County of San Francisco
Plaintiff:
S.F. Town Taxi Inc., Sai Lee, Alliance Cab and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv03617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-16493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Roy Flugence v. City and County of San Francis, et al
as 13-17529
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY FLUGENCE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSIT AGENCY, NATHANIEL FORD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv04007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv06523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Flugence v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2012cv00437
Plaintiff:
Roy Flugence
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Municipal Transit Agency, Nathaniel Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
