Rose et al v. Rhorer et al
| The Survivors of James Larson, Raj K. Judge, Elley Fore, III, Larry Richards and Donald Rose |
| Christine, Dee, Bevan Dufty, Ed De Masi, Bernard Gunther, Scott Walton, Joyce Grim, Steve Arcelona, Edwin M. Lee, Trent Rhorer, San Francisco Board of Supervisors, The San Francisco Department of Human Services, The San Francisco Department of Aging and Adult Services, The Mayor's Office of Hope and Dennis Herrera |
| 3:2013cv03502 |
| July 30, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| William H. Orrick |
| American with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
129
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS; SEALING RECORDS. San Francisco's motion for summary judgment and judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED. The plaintiffs' complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with respect to plaintiffs Donald Rose, Larry Richards, Elley Fore III, and Raj K. Judge. The complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with respect to the plaintiffs identified in the original complaint who have not appear ed in this litigation. Mr. Rose's other claims (Dkt. Nos. 93-96, 124-127) are DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND and Mr. Roses records at Docket Number 54-5 are ordered SEALED. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/09/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2014)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER SETTING JANUARY 31, 2014 DEADLINE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT - The Court extends the deadline for plaintiffs to file an amended complaint untilJanuary 31, 2014 to afford plaintiffs time to determine whether counsel will represent them in thi s case and, if so, prepare an amended complaint. Whether or not plaintiffs obtain counsel, or anything else occurs between now and then, the last day for plaintiffs to amend their complaint is January 31, 2014. Otherwise, the existing complaint shall be treated as the operative pleading.Amended Pleadings due by 1/31/2014. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/09/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2014)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS FOR "EMERGENCY PROTECTION" by Judge William H. Orrick denying plaintiffs' requests at document numbers 64 and 65 . (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
