Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Cropper v. County of Fresno et al
as 1:2026cv05228
Plaintiff: Ricky Dee Cropper
Defendant: County of Fresno, Fresno County District Attorney's Office, Law Offices of the Fresno County Public Defender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2336
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Dees et al v. Eby et al
as 1:2026cv01318
Plaintiff: Jennifer L. Dees and Ethan D. Smith
Defendant: Brett Eby and Saratoga County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade et al v. Garst et al
as 5:2026cv00083
Plaintiff: Frank Wesley Wade and William Townsley Wade, Jr.
Defendant: Marsha Garst, Austin Armentrout, Corporal Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abraham et al v. Austen et al
as 3:2026cv00504
Plaintiff: Anthony Abraham, Jr. and Anthony Abraham, Sr.
Defendant: Kevin Austen, Brandy Cook, W. Morlowe Rory, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00714
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Holz v. Nolan
as 5:2026cv01513
Plaintiff: Timothy E Holz
Defendant: Dee Nolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Simpson County, Kentucky et al
as 1:2026cv00112
Defendant: Deputy Hughes, Simpson County, Kentucky, Jere Dee Hopson and others
Plaintiff: Braxton Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Beard v. Gilligan et al
as 2:2026cv02058
Plaintiff: Keith A. Beard
Defendant: Kerri Dee Gilligan and Dennis C. Gilligan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
v. Beard et al
as 2:2026cv02061
Defendant: Keith A. Beard, Kerri Dee Gilligan and Dennis C. Gilligan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?