United States Of America v. Eggleston
United States Of America |
Janis Eggleston |
3:2013cv03557 |
August 1, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Francisco |
Debt-Magistrate |
Contract: Recovery Student Loan |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Default of Student Loan |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 90 STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING 89 Joint Stipulation Extending Time for hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Janis Eggleston., Set/Reset Deadlines as to 64 MOTION for Summary Judgment plaintiff's wit h notice. Motion Hearing reset from 6/6/2017 to 6/27/2017 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 5/25/2017. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2017) |
Filing 76 ORDER granting 75 Motion For Extension of Time. The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs request to extend time to submit its reply to Defendants opposition to the 64 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs reply to Defendants opposition is due on April 26, 2017. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 4/19/2017. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2017) |
Filing 40 ORDER TO CONTINUE THE DATE OF THE FURTHER SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Re 39 Proposed Order filed by United States Of America. Settlement Conference set for 1/29/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 11/10/2015. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2015) |
Filing 33 ORDER to Continue the Case Management Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte: Re 31 Stipulation with Proposed Order to Continue Settlement Conference filed by Janis Eggleston. The Case Management Conference is rescheduled to 9/22/2015 at 10:00 am before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte in Courtroom E, 15th floor, San Francisco. The joint case management statement shall be filed no later than 9/15/2015. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2015) |
Filing 30 ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. The Case Management Conference is continued to 4/28/15 at 3:00 p.m. and a joint Case Management Conference Statement shall be filed no later than 4/21/15. The deadline to file a motion to strike is continued to 4/28/15, with a hearing on 6/16/15 at 9:00 a.m. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2014) |
Filing 24 ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. The deadline to file a motion to strike in this case is continued to January 13, 2015, with ahearing on February 17, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.(shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2014) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: United States Of America v. Eggleston | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: United States Of America | |
Represented By: | Michael Cosentino |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Janis Eggleston | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.