Ellis v. City of Pittsburg et al
| Donald Ray Ellis |
| City of Pittsburg and Sal Evola |
| 3:2014cv00193 |
| January 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Contra Costa |
| Joseph C. Spero |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER by Judge Joseph C. Spero re second review under 28 U.S.C. section 1915; denying (24) Motion; denying (25) Motion in case 3:14-cv-00193-JCS (jcslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2014)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER dismissing complaint with leave to amend under 28 U.S.C. section 1915(e)(2)(B). Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on March 19, 2014. (jcslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2014)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 4/18/2014. Case Management Conference set for 4/25/2014 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 2/6/14. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2014)
|
|
Filing
7
Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re C-14-197 EDL. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 1/15/14. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2014)
|
|
Filing
5
SUA SPONTE JUDICIAL REFERRAL FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP OF CASES. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 1/16/2014. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
