Marqus Martinez et al v. County of Sonoma et al
| Marqus Martinez and Daniel Banks |
| County of Sonoma, Steve Freitas, Mazen Awad and Brian Galloway |
| 3:2015cv04574 |
| October 5, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Sonoma |
| James Donato |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
ORDER CONDITIONALLY DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge James Donato on 6/15/2018. (jdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2018)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER: The court ordinarily hears from defendants who also are percipient witnesses at settlement conferences and tries not to inconvenience parties overly. That said, the court has worked with both counsel before and trusts their assessment of ap propriate attendance. The court asks counsel to ensure that defendants who might be helpful to the court's ordinary settlement process (including the ordinary joint session) are present. Re: (47 in 3:15-cv-04574-JD) Letter filed by Adam Gordon , Chad McMasters, Kyle Smith, Matthew Crook, Steve Freitas, Michael Patrick, Joseph Medeiros, Robert Travelstead, Jason Squires, Joseph Nougier, Brian Galloway, William Walton, Craig Peterson, Todd Grenier, County of Sonoma, Amanda Lee, Michael Merchen, Joseph Galante, David Cooper. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 8/5/2016. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
