Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Gabbi Lemos v. County of Sonoma, et al
as 19-15222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GABBI LEMOS
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVE FREITAS, MARCUS HOLTON and COUNTY OF SONOMA
Schneider v. Fadaki et al
as 3:2017cv05026
Plaintiff:
Leland Schneider
Defendant:
Niloofar Fadaki, California Forensic Medical Group, Inc., Steve Freitas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Del Valle v. County of Sonoma et al
as 3:2017cv03611
Plaintiff:
Fernando Del Valle
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Steve Freitas, Scott Thorne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez et al v. County of Sonoma et al
as 4:2017cv03176
Plaintiff:
Marqus Martinez , Daniel Banks , Jesus Lopez and others
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Steve Freitas and Mazen Awad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Becerra v. County of Sonoma et al
as 4:2017cv02893
Plaintiff:
Jose Juan Becerra
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Steve Freitas, Mazen Awad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zeen v. County of Sonoma et al
as 3:2017cv02056
Plaintiff:
Dane Zeen
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Steve Freitas, Michael Yoder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Freitas et al
as 3:2017cv01529
Plaintiff:
Lee Randolph Stewart
Defendant:
Steve Freitas, A. Marlowe, Huddleston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry Weiss v. City of Santa Rosa Police Depa, et al
as 16-17363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY L. WEISS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SANTA ROSA POLICE DEPARTMENT, TOM SCHWEDHELM, in his official capacity, JOHN DEADMAN, Badge #440, individually and in his official capacity and others
Briggs v. Freitas et al
as 3:2016cv07049
Plaintiff:
Jack F. Briggs
Defendant:
Steve Freitas, Randal Walker, H Paulson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfe v. Freitas et al
as 3:2016cv06799
Plaintiff:
Steven Dean Wolfe
Defendant:
Steve Freitas, Randell Walker, T. Caughey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
