GoPro, Inc. v. C&A Marketing, Inc. et al
GoPro, Inc. |
C&A Marketing, Inc., C&A Licensing, LLC and PLR IP Holdings, LLC |
5:2016cv03590 |
June 27, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
San Mateo |
Nathanael M. Cousins |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 83 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 82 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Case Management Conference filed by GoPro, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 8/16/2017 at 5:00 PM. Further Case Management Conference set for 8/23/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 1, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2017) |
Filing 80 CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 24, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2017) |
Filing 70 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY by Judge Jon S. Tigar denying 40 Motion to Stay. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2017) |
Filing 62 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting 54 Motion to Strike. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2017) |
Filing 57 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 55 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 54 MOTION to Strike Declaration of Alan C. Bovik - Stipulation to Set an Earlier Hearing Date filed by GoPro, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 24, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2017) |
Filing 51 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 47 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 39 MOTION to Amend/Correct Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint Stipulation, Notice and [Proposed] Order filed by GoPro, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 16, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2017) |
Filing 46 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 45 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation and Proposed Order Extending Time for Plaintiff to File Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Stay filed by GoPro, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 8, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2017) |
Filing 43 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 41 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Stipulation and Proposed Order Extending Time for Defendants to File Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File filed by GoPro, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 1, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2017) |
Filing 37 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 36 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER To Extend Time To Serve Damages Contentions and Responsive Damages Contentions filed by GoPro, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 9, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2017) |
Filing 35 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 34 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time to Serve Invalidity Contentions and Exchange Preliminary Claim Constructions filed by C&A Marketing, Inc., C&A Licensing, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 18, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2017) |
Filing 26 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 25 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by GoPro, Inc. filed by GoPro, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 3, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2016) |
Filing 21 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Continuance of Initial Case Management Conference filed by C&A Marketing, Inc., PLR IP Holdings, LLC, C&A Licensing, LLC. Case Management Statement due by 10/7/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/19/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 20, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2016) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.