Cases 1 - 10 of 58
GoPro, Inc. v. Arashi Vision Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00681
Plaintiff:
GoPro, Inc.
Defendant:
Arashi Vision Inc., d/b/a Insta360, Arashi Vision (U.S.) LLC, d/b/a Insta360, Arashi Vision Inc. a Chinese corporation doing business as Insta360 and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
GoPro, Inc. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv20037
Plaintiff:
GoPro, Inc.
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Montoya v. GoPro Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv04082
Plaintiff:
Miguel Montoya
Defendant:
GoPro Inc. and ACME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
GOPRO, INC. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associates Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2023cv02222
Plaintiff:
GOPRO, INC.
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associates Identified on Schedule A Hereto
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
GoPro, Inc. v. United States
as 1:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
GoPro, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Customs and Border Protection and United States
Montoya v. GoPro Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01534
Plaintiff:
Miguel Montoya
Defendant:
GoPro Inc. and ACME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Contour IP Holding LLC v. GoPro, Inc.
as 22-1691
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONTOUR IP HOLDING LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
GOPRO, INC.
Contour IP Holding LLC v. GoPro, Inc.
as 22-1654
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONTOUR IP HOLDING LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
GOPRO, INC.
Sunflower Licensing LLC v. GoPro, Inc.
as 1:2021cv01813
Plaintiff:
Sunflower Licensing LLC
Defendant:
GoPro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
