Patterson v. Zewert et al
| Bryan Damon Patterson |
| Thomas Zewert, Fernando Tuvera, Law San Fu, Lawrence Gamboa, Edward Birosong, Randulf Fabuiza, J. Villafuerte, M. Jansen, C. Hernandez and C. Bourne |
| 3:2017cv06914 |
| December 4, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| PSLC MWD |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
121
ORDER REOPENING ACTION AND DISSOLVING STAY; ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/17/2023. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER REOPENING ACTION; ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO REFILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION. Dispositive Motion due by 2/3/2020. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/31/19. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(clS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2019)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER REOPENING CASE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/15/18. The deputy clerk hereby certifies that on 3/15/18 a copy of this order was served by sending it via first-class mail to the address of each non-CM/ECF user listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2018)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
