Thomas v. City Of Concord et al
Anthony Thomas |
City Of Concord, Guy Swanger, Daniel Walker, David Savage, Christopher Blakely and Stroud Todd |
3:2018cv07484 |
December 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Elizabeth D Laporte |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 Summons Issued as to Stroud Todd. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2019) |
Filing 20 Summons Issued as to Christopher Blakely. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2019) |
Filing 19 Summons Issued as to Daniel Walker. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2019) |
Filing 18 Summons Issued as to David Savage. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2019) |
Filing 17 Summons Issued as to Guy Swanger. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2019) |
Filing 16 Summons Issued as to City Of Concord. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2019) |
Filing 15 Proposed Summons. (Bulgucheva, Lilia) (Filed on 2/4/2019) |
Filing 14 Proposed Summons. (Bulgucheva, Lilia) (Filed on 2/4/2019) |
Filing 13 Proposed Summons. (Bulgucheva, Lilia) (Filed on 2/4/2019) |
Filing 12 Proposed Summons. (Bulgucheva, Lilia) (Filed on 2/4/2019) |
Filing 11 Proposed Summons. (Bulgucheva, Lilia) (Filed on 2/4/2019) |
Filing 10 Proposed Summons. (Bulgucheva, Lilia) (Filed on 2/4/2019) |
Filing 9 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES (Violation of Civil Rights); DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL; against All Defendants. Filed byAnthony Thomas. (Bulgucheva, Lilia) (Filed on 2/4/2019) Modified on 2/5/2019 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Guy Swanger. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2019) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to City Of Concord. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2019) |
Filing 6 Proposed Summons. (Bulgucheva, Lilia) (Filed on 1/24/2019) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons. (Bulgucheva, Lilia) (Filed on 1/24/2019) |
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Anthony Thomas.. (Bulgucheva, Lilia) (Filed on 12/13/2018) |
Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 3/5/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/12/2019 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 12/12/18. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2018) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/26/2018. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2018) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES; (VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS); DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL; (NO PROCESS); against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12923375.). Filed byAnthony Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bulgucheva, Lilia) (Filed on 12/12/2018) Modified on 12/13/2018 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.