Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jane Doe v. City of Concord, et al
as 22-15384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CONCORD, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, GUY SWANGER and others
Doe v. City Of Concord et al
as 3:2020cv02432
Defendant:
Laura Passaglia, Christopher Walpole, County of Sonoma and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donohue v. City of Concord et al
as 3:2019cv08439
Plaintiff:
John Donohue
Defendant:
Chief of Police Guy Swanger, Concord City of, Daniel Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. City Of Concord et al
as 3:2018cv07484
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thomas
Defendant:
City Of Concord, Guy Swanger, Daniel Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bobby Lawrence v. City of Concord, et al
as 18-15638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY LAWRENCE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CONCORD, GUY SWANGER, Chief, MIKE HANSEN and others
Woolery v. City Of Concord et al
as 3:2017cv06786
Plaintiff:
John Woolery
Defendant:
City Of Concord, Concord Police Department, Scott Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy v. Contra Costa County et al
as 3:2015cv02672
Plaintiff:
Chadrick Willie Roy
Defendant:
Contra Costa County, David O. Livingston, Contra Costa County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns et al v. City of Concord et al
as 4:2014cv00535
Defendant:
Concord Police Department, Guy Swanger, Mark Peterson and others
Plaintiff:
John Burns , Tammy Burns , Bobby Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weiland v. City of Concord et al
as 4:2013cv05570
Plaintiff:
Walther Weiland
Defendant:
City of Concord, Chief of Police Guy Swanger and Kevin Mansourian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juszczyk et al v. Sansen et al
as 4:2013cv02310
Plaintiff:
Kevin Juszczyk
Defendant:
Sansen , Lyle Robles , Eric Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
