Bush v. Cardtronics Inc. et al
| William David Bush |
| Cardtronics Inc., Fiserv Inc. and BlackRock Inc. |
| 3:2019cv01373 |
| March 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Banks and Banking |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE. Civil Case Number 19-cv-1373-LB assigned in error. The correct civil miscellaneous case number is 3:19-MC-80062-LB. Please use case number 3:19-MC-80062-LB for all future filings. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2019) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by William David Bush.. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2019) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by William David Bush. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2019) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 6/6/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/13/2019 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2019) |
| Filing 1 REQUEST to conduct discovery in foreign litigation filed by William David Bush. Responses due by 3/28/2019. Replies due by 4/4/2019. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
