Hill v. Supreme Ct. of CA et al
| Nathan Hill |
| Court of Appeal, Supreme Ct. of CA, C.D.C.R. and L.A. County Courthouse Corporation |
| 3:2019cv02928 |
| May 28, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Charles R Breyer |
| PSLC LLH |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred to Central District of California via ECF. New case number - 2:19-cv-05331. (mclS, COURT STAFF) Modified on 6/20/2019 (mclS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 6
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/14/2019. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/14/2019)
|
| Filing 5 REQUEST by Nathan Hill. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/13/2019) |
| Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Filed byC.D.C.R., Supreme Ct. of CA, L.A. County Courthouse Corporation, Court of Appeal. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2019) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE Petition on Form due by 7/5/2019. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2019) |
| Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 7/5/2019. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2019) |
| Filing 1 Habeas Corpus for Release from False Imprisonment by Nathan Hill. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
