Harriman v. Doordash, Inc.
Plaintiff: R. HARRIMAN
Defendant: Doordash, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2019cv06411
Filed: October 7, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Laurel Beeler
Referring Judge: Joseph C Spero
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2021 Filing 32 STIPULATION of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Doordash, Inc.. (Lipshutz, Joshua) (Filed on 2/12/2021)
January 6, 2021 Filing 31 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: In light of the notice of settlement, the court continues the initial CMC from 1/14/2021 to 4/15/2021 at 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor to avoid losing track of the case, and directs the filing of a stipulated dismissal or a short update by 4/8/2021. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2021)
January 5, 2021 Filing 30 STATUS REPORT (Joint) by Doordash, Inc.. (Lipshutz, Joshua) (Filed on 1/5/2021)
September 29, 2020 Filing 29 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: In light of the notice of settlement, the court continues the initial CMC from 10/15/2020 to 1/14/2021 at 9:30 AM to avoid losing track of the case, and directs the filing of a stipulated dismissal or a short update by 1/7/2021. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lb General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proce edings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (Th is is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2020)
September 29, 2020 Filing 28 STATUS REPORT (Joint Status Report) by R. Harriman. (Sagafi, Jahan) (Filed on 9/29/2020)
July 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 27 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #26 Stipulation to Stay Proceedings Pending Settlement. To avoid losing track of the case, the court sets a Case Management Conference for 10/15/2020 at 9:30 AM. Case Management Statement due by 10/8/2020. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2020)
July 29, 2020 Filing 26 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Stay Proceedings Pending Settlement filed by Doordash, Inc.. (Lipshutz, Joshua) (Filed on 7/29/2020)
April 15, 2020 Filing 25 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TIME: Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/13/2020 at 11:00 AM is reset to 9:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2020)
March 27, 2020 Filing 24 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: The court previously stayed the case and, as a calendaring device, continues the CMC set for 4/2/2020 to 8/13/2020 at 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 8/6/2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2020)
March 19, 2020 Filing 23 CLERK'S NOTICE RE: UPDATED CALL-IN INFORMATION FOR CMC/MOTION HEARING: The court circulates the following conference number to allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone:Dial In: 877-336-1839Access Code: 8191201# (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2020)
March 18, 2020 Filing 22 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options by DoorDash, Inc. and Counsel (Lipshutz, Joshua) (Filed on 3/18/2020)
March 17, 2020 Filing 21 ADR Clerks Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order. The parties have failed to file an ADR Certification as required by the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order. Counsel shall comply promptly with the requirements of ADR L.R. 3-5(b) and shall file the ADR Certification. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2020)
March 16, 2020 Filing 20 CLERK'S NOTICE RE: CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE / MOTION HEARING: Through at least April 17, 2020, the court will not have any in-person civil case-management conferences or civil motions hearings and instead will have telephonic appearances. For motions hearings, the court is open to hearings by Skype for Business or Google Hangouts (because for now, the court cannot host conferences by Zoom). (This latter approach requires IT staff to provide the court with a web cam so there may be some delay.) Telephonic appearances generally are by CourtCall, but the court also circulates the following conference number, which can accommodate up to 200 people and allow the equivalent of a public hearing by telephone: Dial In: 877-336-1839 Access Code: 8191201#Security Code: 200402# (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2020)
March 13, 2020 Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Moira Heiges-Goepfert (Heiges-Goepfert, Moira) (Filed on 3/13/2020)
March 13, 2020 Filing 18 NOTICE of Change In Counsel by Jahan C. Sagafi of Attorney Relic Sun (Sagafi, Jahan) (Filed on 3/13/2020)
December 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #13 Administrative Motion for Stay Pending Final Approval of Class Settlement. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2019)
December 12, 2019 Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Doordash, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 2/6/2020 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 12/26/2019. Replies due by 1/2/2020. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting DoorDash, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss)(Lipshutz, Joshua) (Filed on 12/12/2019)
December 9, 2019 Filing 15 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #13 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Stay Pending Final Approval of Class Settlement ) filed byR. Harriman. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of JAHAN C. SAGAFI, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Proposed Order)(Sagafi, Jahan) (Filed on 12/9/2019)
December 6, 2019 Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/2/2020 at 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 3/26/2020. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2019)
December 3, 2019 Filing 13 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION to Stay Pending Final Approval of Class Settlement filed by Doordash, Inc.. Responses due by 12/9/2019. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Andrew Wilhelm, #2 Proposed Order)(Lipshutz, Joshua) (Filed on 12/3/2019)
November 1, 2019 Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by R. Harriman. Doordash, Inc. served on 10/21/2019, answer due 11/12/2019. (Sagafi, Jahan) (Filed on 11/1/2019)
October 23, 2019 Filing 11 STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint by 30 Days Pursuant to L.R. 6-1 filed by Doordash, Inc.. (Lipshutz, Joshua) (Filed on 10/23/2019)
October 23, 2019 Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Doordash, Inc... (Lipshutz, Joshua) (Filed on 10/23/2019)
October 21, 2019 Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by R. Harriman.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Blumenthal, Aaron) (Filed on 10/21/2019)
October 21, 2019 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 11/4/2019. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/21/2019)
October 18, 2019 Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Entities by R. Harriman (Sagafi, Jahan) (Filed on 10/18/2019)
October 17, 2019 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to the case. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2019)
October 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER RELATING CASE. The court finds that the cases are related: C19-4637 LB and C19-6411 JCS. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 10/16/2019. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2019)
October 11, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Doordash, Inc.. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2019)
October 11, 2019 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement d ue by 1/3/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/10/2020 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2019)
October 7, 2019 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/21/2019. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2019)
October 7, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Sagafi, Jahan) (Filed on 10/7/2019)
October 7, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against Doordash, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400.00, receipt number 0971-13771225.). Filed by R. Harriman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sagafi, Jahan) (Filed on 10/7/2019) Modified on 10/12/2019 (gbaS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harriman v. Doordash, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doordash, Inc.
Represented By: Joshua Seth Lipshutz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: R. HARRIMAN
Represented By: Jahan C. Sagafi
Represented By: Relic Sun
Represented By: Molly Jane Frandsen
Represented By: Steven M. Tindall
Represented By: Aaron Blumenthal
Represented By: Moira Heiges-Goepfert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?