Colopy et al v. Uber Technologies Inc.
Plaintiff: Thomas Colopy, Christopher James and Spencer Verhines
Defendant: Uber Technologies Inc.
Case Number: 3:2019cv06462
Filed: October 8, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Edward M Chen
Referring Judge: Joseph C Spero
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 33 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Uber Technologies Inc.. Filed byThomas Colopy, Christopher James, Spencer Verhines. (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 1/3/2020)
December 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 32 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SET DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND. Amended Pleadings due by 1/3/2020. Responses due by 2/3/2020. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/23/19. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2019)
December 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 31 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO SET DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND filed by Uber Technologies Inc.. (Evangelis, Theane) (Filed on 12/20/2019)
December 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Denying #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction; Granting in Part and Denying in Part #11 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss; and Denying #11 Defendant's Motion to Strike. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2019)
December 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 29 TRANSCRIPT ORDER for proceedings held on 11/21/2019 before Judge Edward M. Chen for Court Reporter Debra Pas. (rjdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2019)
November 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 28 Transcript of Proceedings held on 11-21-2019, before Judge Edward M. Chen. Court Reporter/Transcriber Debra L. Pas, CRR, telephone number (415) 431-1477/Email: Debra_Pas@cand.uscourts.gov. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/25/2020. (pasdl50S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/27/2019)
November 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 27 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Edward M. Chen: Motion Hearing held on 11/21/2019; taking under submission #11 Motion to Dismiss; #11 Motion to Strike; #2 Motion for Preliminary Injunction.Total Time in Court: 39 Minutes. Court Reporter: Debra Pas. Plaintiff Attorney: Shannon Liss-Riordan. Defendant Attorneys: Theanne Evangelis, Heather Richardson, Brandon Stoker. Attachment: Minute Order. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 11/21/2019)
November 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Evangelis, Theane) (Filed on 11/20/2019)
November 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 11/14/2019)
November 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 24 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Thomas Colopy. (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 11/14/2019)
November 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ADR Clerks Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order. The parties have failed to file an ADR Certification as required by the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order. Counsel shall comply promptly with the requirements of ADR L.R. 3-5(b) and shall file the ADR Certification. (ec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2019)
November 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 22 REPLY in Support (re #11 MOTION to Dismiss and MOTION to Strike #1 Complaint) filed by Uber Technologies Inc.. (Evangelis, Theane) (Filed on 11/7/2019)
November 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 REPLY in Support (re #2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction ) filed by Thomas Colopy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K)(Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 11/7/2019)
November 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #11 MOTION to Dismiss and MOTION to Strike #1 Complaint, ) filed byThomas Colopy. (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 11/1/2019)
October 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ERRATA re #16 Opposition/Response to Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Uber Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Corrected Opposition Brief)(Evangelis, Theane) (Filed on 10/30/2019)
October 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Declaration of THEANE EVANGELIS in Support of #16 Opposition/Response to Motion filed byUber Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Related document(s) #16 ) (Evangelis, Theane) (Filed on 10/29/2019)
October 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Declaration of JENNIFER McCALEB in Support of #16 Opposition/Response to Motion filed byUber Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Related document(s) #16 ) (Evangelis, Theane) (Filed on 10/29/2019)
October 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction ) filed byUber Technologies Inc.. (Evangelis, Theane) (Filed on 10/29/2019)
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Order by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #14 Stipulation to Set Briefing Schedule. Defendant's responsive motion to plaintiff's class action complaint due 10/18/2019; plaintiff's opposition due 11/1/2019; defendant's reply due 11/7/2019; hearing and schedule re: preliminary injunction motion papers remains the same. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2019)
October 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 9 Clerk's Notice to Set Briefing Schedule filed by Uber Technologies Inc.. (Evangelis, Theane) (Filed on 10/21/2019)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Declaration of JOSHUA LIPSHUTZ in Support of #11 MOTION to Dismiss and MOTION to Strike #1 Complaint, filed byUber Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Related document(s) #11 ) (Evangelis, Theane) (Filed on 10/18/2019)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Declaration of MICHAEL CHAN in Support of #11 MOTION to Dismiss and MOTION to Strike #1 Complaint, filed byUber Technologies Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Related document(s) #11 ) (Evangelis, Theane) (Filed on 10/18/2019)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss and, MOTION to Strike #1 Complaint, filed by Uber Technologies Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 11/21/2019 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. Responses due by 11/1/2019. Replies due by 11/7/2019. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Evangelis, Theane) (Filed on 10/18/2019)
October 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Entities by Uber Technologies Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Uber Technologies, Inc., Other Affiliate SoftBank Group Corp., Other Affiliate SB Cayman 2 Ltd. for Uber Technologies Inc.. (Evangelis, Theane) (Filed on 10/18/2019)
October 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE: As noted from minutes in related case, motion hearing re #2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction set for 11/21/2019 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor before Judge Edward M. Chen. Responses due by 10/29/2019. Replies due by 11/7/2019. Initial Case Management Conference also set for 11/21/2019 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 11/14/2019. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2019)
October 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER RELATING CASE. Case related to 3:13-cv-3826-EMC, O'Connor v. Uber Technologies Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/10/2019. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2019)
October 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Case Reassigned to Judge Edward M. Chen. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2019)
October 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Uber Technologies Inc.. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2019)
October 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement d ue by 1/3/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/10/2020 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2019)
October 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Thomas Colopy re 4 Clerk's Notice,,, (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 10/9/2019)
October 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE: Plaintiff in Colopy v. Uber Technologies Inc. (3:19-cv-06462) has filed a motion to relate the case to OConnor v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (3:13-cv-03826). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12, Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc. shall have the opportunity to respond. The response must specifically address the issues in Civil L.R. 3-12(a) and (d) and be served on all parties and lodged with the Chambers of all Judges identified in the motion. The response shall be filed by 3pm on Thursday, October 10, 2019. Plaintiff to immediately notify Defendant of the opportunity to respond and the deadline by which to do so; proof of that notice shall be filed with this Court.. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2019)
October 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/22/2019. (ajsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2019)
October 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Thomas Colopy. Responses due by 10/22/2019. Replies due by 10/29/2019. (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 10/8/2019)
October 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT against Uber Technologies Inc. (Filing fee $ 400.00, receipt number 0971-13775920.). Filed by Thomas Colopy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 10/8/2019) Modified on 10/9/2019 (gbaS, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Colopy et al v. Uber Technologies Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber Technologies Inc.
Represented By: Theane Evangelis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Colopy
Represented By: Shannon Liss-Riordan
Represented By: Anne R. Kramer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher James
Represented By: Shannon Liss-Riordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Spencer Verhines
Represented By: Shannon Liss-Riordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?