Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Volpe et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 2:2026cv14355
Plaintiff:
Zachary R. Volpe, Deborah Walker, Ronald Thomas Aussner and others
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, DuPont de Nemours, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
US v. Christopher Porter
as 26-4458
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER JAMES PORTER, a/k/a Christopher Porter
Christopher Mansoori v. Riyaz Patel
as 26-2801
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JAMES MANSOORI
Defendant:
RIYAZ PATEL, Correctional Officer
Christopher Mansoori v. Google, LLC, et al
as 26-2559
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JAMES MANSOORI
Defendant:
GOOGLE, LLC, JOHN MYLAN TRAYLOR, PERKINS COIE, LLP and others
James v. Flythe's RV LLC et al
as 3:2026cv01952
Plaintiff:
Christopher James
Defendant:
Flythe's RV LLC and William Flythe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Dassault Systems Solidworks Corporation v. Scotia Engineering, Inc et al
as 2:2026cv07652
Defendant:
SCOTIA ENGINEERING, INC, Oscar Urena and Christopher James MATISZIK
Plaintiff:
Dassault Systems Solidworks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
USA v. Christopher Dowtin
as 26-3620
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER JAMES DOWTIN
Lemaster v. Wexford Medical Services et al
as 5:2026cv00131
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Lemaster
Defendant:
Wexford Medical Services, Dr. Proctor and Liz Blackburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mansoori v. Wimmer et al
as 1:2026cv07296
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Mansoori
Defendant:
Benjamin Wimmer, Carolyn R. Klarquist, James E. Chadd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2026cv07226
Plaintiff:
Pro se Christopher James Mansoori
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
