DOSS et al v. County of Alameda et al
| J.L.J.A., BARBARA DOSS, B.A. and O.A. |
| Joshua Plosser, County of Alameda, Sheriff Gregory Ahern, Monica Devine, Eduardo Rivera-Velazquez, Kevin Calhoun, Dylan Green, "FNU" MOSCHETTI, Josephine Constanzo and DOES 1-50 |
| 3:2019cv07940 |
| December 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Sallie Kim |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by J.L.J.A., B.A., BARBARA DOSS, O.A.. Gregory Ahern served on 1/9/2020, answer due 1/30/2020; Kevin Calhoun served on 1/9/2020, answer due 1/30/2020; Josephine Constanzo served on 1/9/2020, answer due 1/30/2020; County of Alameda served on 1/9/2020, answer due 1/30/2020; Monica Devine served on 1/9/2020, answer due 1/30/2020; Dylan Green served on 1/9/2020, answer due 1/30/2020; "FNU" MOSCHETTI served on 1/9/2020, answer due 1/30/2020; Joshua Plosser served on 1/9/2020, answer due 1/30/2020; Eduardo Rivera-Velazquez served on 1/9/2020, answer due 1/30/2020. (Gray, Lateef) (Filed on 1/29/2020) |
Filing 6
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim for all further proceedings. Judge James Donato no longer assigned to case,. Signed by Clerk on 12/11/19. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2019)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Gregory Ahern, Kevin Calhoun, Josephine Constanzo, County of Alameda, Monica Devine, Dylan Green, "FNU" MOSCHETTI, Joshua Plosser, Eduardo Rivera-Velazquez. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2019) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 2/27/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/5/2020 10:00 AM. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2019) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge James Donato. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2019) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Nisenbaum, Benjamin) (Filed on 12/4/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR WRONGFUL DEATH AND VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS AND DAMAGES - JURY TRIAL DEMANDED against Gregory Ahern, Kevin Calhoun, Josephine Constanzo, County of Alameda, DOES 1-50, Monica Devine, Dylan Green, "FNU" MOSCHETTI, Joshua Plosser, Eduardo Rivera-Velazquez ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13947727.). Filed byBARBARA DOSS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Burris, John) (Filed on 12/4/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
