Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Aviles Sanchez, et al. v. Blanche
as 26-5225
Petitioner:
MARIA VIRGINIA AVILES SANCHEZ, HAZEL ESMERALDA OTLICA AVILES, B. A. O.A. and others
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2437
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
O.A. v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv03266
Plaintiff:
O.A.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02927
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00195
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01955
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
O.A. v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Company et al
as 3:2025cv09545
Plaintiff:
O.A.
Defendant:
Beech-Nut Nutrition Company, Gerber Products Company, Nestle Enterprises S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv11632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Adeyemi et al v. CRST Specialized Transportation, Inc. et al
as 5:2025cv00211
Plaintiff:
Oluwamayokun Emmanuel Adeyemi, Rita Adidemi Adeyemi and O.A.
Defendant:
CRST Specialized Transportation, Inc. and Christopher Leslie Jones Asgill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
