Garrard et al v. Newsom et al
Robert Richardson and Carol garrard |
XAVIER BECERRA, Hon. Michael B. Parker, Gavin Newsom, Chief Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye, Eduardo De La Riva, Tani Gorre Cantil-Sakauye, Kay Cooperman Jue, Michael A. Moodian, Richard Simpson, Sarah Kruer Jager, Leondra R. Kruger, Victor E. Salazar, Lisa B. Lench, Ming W. Chin, Goodwin H. Liu, Carol A. Corrigan, Joshua P. Groban, William S. Dato, Mariano-Florentino Cuellar and Michael B. Harper |
3:2020cv04706 |
July 14, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Charles R Breyer |
Sallie Kim |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 ORDER of USCA (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2020) |
Filing 18 USCA Case Number 20-16511 9th Circuit for #17 Notice of Appeal filed by Carol Garrard. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2020) |
Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Carol Garrard. (FEE STATUS: IFP). (Look, William) (Filed on 8/6/2020) Modified on 8/7/2020 (fabS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 16 ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer adopting #13 Report and Recommendations; denying #14 Ex Parte Application. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2020) |
Filing 15 ORDER, Case Reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Charles R. Breyer for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by The Clerk on 8/3/20. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2020) |
Filing 14 Ex Parte Ex Parte Application re #7 Order on Ex Parte Application, #13 Report and Recommendations,, Terminate Motions,, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings, #10 Order, #9 Notice (Other), #8 Notice (Other), #11 Amended Complaint, Rule 72 Motion for Review of Magistrate's Orders filed by Robert Richardson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit)(Look, William) (Filed on 8/3/2020) |
Filing 13 ORDER TO REASSIGN AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #11 Amended Complaint. The #12 EX PARTE MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF MAGISTRATE SALLY KIM is denied as moot. Objections due by 8/17/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim on 8/3/2020. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2020) |
Filing 12 EX PARTE MOTION FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF MAGISTRATE SALLY KIM filed by Robert Richardson. (Look, William) (Filed on 7/28/2020) Modified on 7/29/2020 (fabS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs. Filed by Robert Richardson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit)(Look, William) (Filed on 7/28/2020) Modified on 7/29/2020 (fabS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 10 ORDER STRIKING #8 Notice (Other) filed by Robert Richardson, #9 Notice (Other) filed by Robert Richardson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim on 7/28/20. (sklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2020) |
Filing 9 NOTICE by Robert Richardson DEMAND FOR DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL MEMBERSHIPS PURSUANT TO FEDERAL CANON 2(C) (Look, William) (Filed on 7/27/2020) |
Filing 8 NOTICE by Robert Richardson re #7 Order on Ex Parte Application, NOTICE OF EX PARTE OBJECTION TO ENTRY OF SUA SPONTE ORDER UNDER RULE 12(b) (Look, William) (Filed on 7/26/2020) |
Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim granting #2 Ex Parte Application ; granting #3 Ex Parte Application; ordering HOLD on service of complaint. Amended complaint due by 9/1/2020. (sklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2020) |
Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/12/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/19/2020 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2020) |
Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/29/2020. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2020) |
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Robert Richardson.. (Look, William) (Filed on 7/14/2020) |
Filing 3 Ex Parte Application app pauperis filed by Carol garrard. (Look, William) (Filed on 7/14/2020) |
Filing 2 Ex Parte Application re #1 Complaint, App. pauperis filed by Robert Richardson. (Look, William) (Filed on 7/14/2020) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs. Filed byCarol garrard. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Look, William) (Filed on 7/14/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.